Photo by Fred Romero (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)
Photo by Fred Romero (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)

Twelve Recursive Explanations

  1. If the Overton Window were not inside of itself, you’d think I was crazy for writing this.
  2. Is it just me, or has the Baader-Meinhof effect been popping up all over the place ever since I learned about it?
  3. It’s hard to justify learning about opportunity costs when there are so many other things you could be doing with that time.
  4. I don’t think the idea of being Pareto Optimal has made anyone better off without making at least one person worse off.
  5. What can we infer from the fact that we find ourselves living in a world where we’ve invented the idea of “Anthropics”?
  6. Everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows that everyone knows (and so on) what common knowledge is.
  7. Ninety percent of explanations of Sturgeon’s Law are crap.
  8. I would teach you about Inferential Distance, but it would take too long to explain it to you.
  9. Let’s meet at the place where you think that I think that you think that I think that you think is a good place to discuss Schelling Points.
  10. If you think this sentence is meta, you’re mistaken; it is one level higher than that.
  11. You should use some of your time learning about new ideas, like the explore-exploit tradeoff, and the rest of your time applying ideas you already know well.
  12. I wasn’t going to include this explanation of the sunk cost fallacy because it’s obviously bad, but at this point, I’ve already invested time into it.

If you liked this piece, you may also like 50 “Laws” of Everything.


This piece was first written on March 21, 2021, and first appeared on this site on March 18, 2022.


  

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *