<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>infinite ethics &#8211; Spencer Greenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.spencergreenberg.com/tag/infinite-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.spencergreenberg.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 01:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23753251</site>	<item>
		<title>Ten weird moral theories</title>
		<link>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/03/ten-weird-moral-theories/</link>
					<comments>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/03/ten-weird-moral-theories/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 01:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infinite ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occam&#039;s razor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[similarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social norms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utilitarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtue ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.spencergreenberg.com/?p=3400</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1. Occamism:&#160;the simpler a moral theory is, the more likely it is to be true. Hence (a priori), the most probable two moral theories are that (a) everything is permissible or that (b) nothing is. 2. Majoritarianism:&#160;an action is morally right if and only if the majority of conscious beings capable of understanding that action [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p></p>



<p><strong>1. Occamism:</strong>&nbsp;the simpler a moral theory is, the more likely it is to be true. Hence (a priori), the most probable two moral theories are that (a) everything is permissible or that (b) nothing is.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>2. Majoritarianism:</strong>&nbsp;an action is morally right if and only if the majority of conscious beings capable of understanding that action and its consequences think it&#8217;s right.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>3. Restraintism:</strong>&nbsp;if you have the desire to do something, then you don&#8217;t get moral credit for doing it (since the action is satisfying your OWN desire).</p>



<p>So, to maximize the good you do, become the sort of person that hates everyone and doesn&#8217;t want to help &#8211; then help a lot anyway!</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>4. Infinitarianism:</strong>&nbsp;god is infinite goodness. A finite number plus an infinite number is just the same infinite number again (left unchanged). All actions humans take can only create finite good. Hence, no human action can change the total goodness in the universe.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>5. Virtue ethics prime:</strong>&nbsp;virtue ethicists are right &#8211; being good is only about having good character. But it turns out the only character strengths that count as morally good are cleanliness and moderation.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>6. Purely positive utilitarianism:&nbsp;</strong>the only thing that matters morally is the sum total of happy mental states (suffering is irrelevant and doesn&#8217;t impact the calculation). Hence the attempts to airdrop MDMA into the forests.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>7. Qualiaism:&nbsp;</strong>some actions are objectively morally right, and others are objectively wrong, but the criteria determining what is right is unique to each human and inaccessible to anyone who is not that person. Hence, each of us must discover our own unique, objectively-true morality.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>8. Tegmark morality:&nbsp;</strong>for every mathematical structure, there exists some universe for which that structure is a complete description of what&#8217;s morally right. Hence, integer addition is a complete and correct moral theory (in some universe).</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>9. Similaritarianism:&nbsp;</strong>how kind you need to behave is determined by how similar someone is to you.</p>



<p>Hence you should be very nice to your parents, less so to strangers, and even less so to a rock. Since you are most similar to yourself, self-kindness is most important of all.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>10. Unnatural law:&nbsp;</strong>we&#8217;re probably living in a simulation. Whoever the simulator(s) were, they were/are vastly more intelligent than us and hence far more likely to understand morality. We must study this creation of theirs (that we call reality) to figure out what&#8217;s good!</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><em>This piece was first written on March 19, 2021, and first appeared on this site on April 23, 2023.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/03/ten-weird-moral-theories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3400</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
