<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>happy chat bench &#8211; Spencer Greenberg</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.spencergreenberg.com/tag/happy-chat-bench/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.spencergreenberg.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2022 03:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23753251</site>	<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;nature plus nurture&#8221; is sometimes the wrong way to think</title>
		<link>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/04/why-nature-plus-nurture-is-sometimes-the-wrong-way-to-think/</link>
					<comments>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/04/why-nature-plus-nurture-is-sometimes-the-wrong-way-to-think/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epigenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exercise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy chat bench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heritability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual differences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactions between genes and environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature plus nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nature vs. nurture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk aversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk-taking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.spencergreenberg.com/?p=3023</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s common to try to explain things as either due to nature OR nurture. Or, at best, we say: some percentage of the variation in outcome is due to genes, and some percentage is due to the environment. It&#8217;s important to remember, though, that outcomes can be a complex interaction between the two. Consider this: [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p></p>



<p>It&#8217;s common to try to explain things as either due to nature OR nurture.</p>



<p>Or, at best, we say: some percentage of the variation in outcome is due to genes, and some percentage is due to the environment. It&#8217;s important to remember, though, that outcomes can be a complex interaction between the two.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p>Consider this:</p>



<p><strong>Our genetically-influenced traits impact what environments we seek out and find ourselves in.</strong></p>



<p>For instance, risk-taking seems to have moderate heritability, and it influences career and life choices that change our environment.</p>



<p>A risk-taker is more likely to seek out riskier environments. And this choice of environment might itself depend on the opportunity set (i.e., current environment). In one environment, risk-taking might mean a greater likelihood of entrepreneurship; in another, it might mean crypto trading, and in a third, drug dealing.</p>



<p>Genetic propensities and the environment we are in can become intertwined.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><strong>Consider depression:</strong></p>



<p>Depression seems to have a heritability in the 20%-60% range.</p>



<p>Some are unusually susceptible to it, others less so. Yet whether someone has a depressive episode or not may depend a lot on what environment they happen to be in.</p>



<p>With meaningful work, supportive friends, a robust exercise routine, and effective self-regulation strategies, even with a high propensity toward depression, you may be able to avoid it. On the other hand, if you&#8217;re unemployed, lonely, and without helpful routines, even with a low propensity toward depression, you may still become depressed.</p>



<p>So while it can be useful to think about the heritability of a trait, it is important to remember that heritable traits can influence what environment we end up in and that the interplay between genes, environment, and our habits/skills/strategies are what leads to outcomes.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p>So while it&#8217;s common to think in terms of:</p>



<p><em>(1) nature OR nurture</em></p>



<p>&#8230;or, at best&#8230;&nbsp;</p>



<p>(2) an&nbsp;<em>additive model:&nbsp;</em>outcome = w * nature + (1-w) * nurture&#8230;</p>



<p>&#8230;Sometimes, a better model has an interaction term:</p>



<p>outcome = w1 * nature + w2* nurture + w3 * <em>nature * nurture.</em></p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<p><em>This was first written on April 28, 2021, and first appeared on this site on December 9, 2022.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.spencergreenberg.com/2021/04/why-nature-plus-nurture-is-sometimes-the-wrong-way-to-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3023</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
